Motor Impairment and Disuse: Key Predictors of Vascular Complications After Stroke.
Giới thiệu
Stroke leads to significant declines in cardiorespiratory fitness, reducing functional capacity. Post-stroke, patients spend 78% of their waking hours in sedentary behaviors— far exceeding recommended physical activity levels—which heightens risks for cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Compounding this issue, emerging evidence reveals maladaptive vascular changes post stroke, including impaired perfusion in the paretic limb due to vascular remodeling.
Current physical therapy interventions in acute settings prioritize neuroplasticity, which is essential for motor recovery. However, targeting cardiorespiratory fitness is equally critical to enhance patients’ ability to engage in daily activities and mitigate long-term vascular complications.
This study aims to investigate vascular changes post stroke by comparing arterial and intramuscular blood flow between the paretic and non-paretic upper limbs. Additionally, we will examine the relationship between these vascular parameters and clinical assessments of stroke-related impairment.
Method
The study included 64 chronic stroke patients (>6 months post-stroke) and 64 matched controls. Participants were community-dwelling adults (≥18 years) with sufficient elbow mobility (60° flexion) and cognition (Abbreviated Mental Test ≥6) for testing. Individuals with other neurological conditions, severe contractures limiting testing, or serious contraindications for participation were excluded. Controls met identical criteria without stroke history.
From: Miller et al., Physical Therapy (2025).
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) quantified upper limb motor impairment (scores 0- 66, higher=worse). Spasticity was measured using the Composite Spasticity Index (CSI; 0- 16), combining biceps tendon reflex (0-4), resistance to passive stretch (0-8), and wrist clonus (1-4), with scores 0-9=mild, 10-12=moderate, and 13-16=severe spasticity. The Motor Activity Log (MAL) assessed real-world arm use through Quality of Movement (MAL-QOM) and Amount of Use (MAL-AOU) subscales (lower scores=greater impairment).
Vascular assessments were conducted using an ultrasound system to evaluate bilateral biceps brachii intramuscular blood perfusion and brachial artery hemodynamics (diameter, flow volume). Imaging focused on the distal third of the biceps (66% of humeral length between coracoid process and cubital fossa) and medial brachial artery. Three measurement trials per parameter were averaged.
Blood flow volume (Vflow; mL/min) was measured using pulse-wave Doppler ultrasound at the previously described anatomical site. Arterial diameter (AD; cm) was determined from endothelial borders within the same image. To assess intramuscular blood perfusion, ultrasound imaging was used to calculate the vascularity index (VI), defined as the ratio of color pixels to total pixels within a specified region of interest.
Data analysis
Sample size was determined using G*Power (n=64/group) based on prior vascular studies (Cohen’s d=3.4 for between-group differences, r=0.35 for correlations). SPSS v28.0 analyzed data with Shapiro-Wilk/Levene tests for normality. Vascular parameters were compared using two-way repeated measures ANOVA (ηp2 effect sizes), with post- hoc t-tests (Bonferroni-corrected). Correlations (Pearson/Spearman) assessed relationships between vascular measures and clinical assessments (FMA, MAL, CSI). Hierarchical regression identified determinants of vascular asymmetry (%SSD), controlling for demographics and limb dominance (separate models for collinear variables). Effect sizes were reported as Cohen’s d (between-group) and correlation coefficients (non-parametric tests).
We will explore the analytical methods in greater depth in the “Talk nerdy to me” section.
Kết quả
The study included 64 chronic stroke survivors (mean age 62.4 ± 10.1 years, 70% male) and age-/sex-matched controls. Participants were on average 5.7 ± 3.9 years post- stroke, with predominantly ischemic strokes (64%, n=41); 36% (n=23) had hemorrhagic strokes. They presented with moderate motor impairment (FMA-UE: 35.9 ± 18.8), mild spasticity (CSI: 8.5 ± 2.4), and minimal functional arm use (MAL-AOU: 1.3 ± 1.3). Basic cognition was preserved (Abbreviated Mental Test ≥6). Controls showed significantly fewer comorbidities and medications (P≤.05). Limb dominance (28 dominant-side affected vs. 36 nondominant) did not influence impairment severity. See Table 1 for full demographics.
From : Miller et al., Physical Therapy (2025).
Vascular ultrasound measures:
The analysis revealed significant differences in vascular measures between stroke survivors and controls. Notably, the paretic limbs of stroke participants showed reduced arterial diameter (AD) and vascularity index (VI) compared to their nonparetic sides, while controls exhibited expected dominance (handedness)-related variations in blood flow. Stroke survivors demonstrated greater asymmetry in AD and VI between limbs than controls. When examining limb dominance subgroups, both groups (dominant- affected and nondominant-affected) showed reduced AD in paretic limbs, while other differences varied by subgroup—particularly in blood flow asymmetry, which was more pronounced when the dominant side was affected. These results highlight distinct vascular alterations in paretic limbs that persist regardless of dominance.
The study found stroke survivors showed significant asymmetry between limbs, with paretic sides demonstrating weaker strength, higher sensory thresholds, and altered body composition (reduced lean mass, increased fat) compared to non-paretic limbs. These differences exceeded normal dominance-related variations seen in controls. Notably, strokes affecting the non-dominant limb resulted in more pronounced body composition changes than dominant-side strokes. The findings reveal that post-stroke limb changes extend beyond motor impairment to include substantial sensory and structural alterations that differ from natural inter-limb variations.
The study found consistent but modest associations between vascular asymmetries (%SSD) and clinical measures in stroke survivors. Vascular parameters (Vflow, AD, VI) showed weak correlations with motor impairment (FMA) and functional arm use (MAL), suggesting that while vascular changes relate to clinical deficits, other factors likely contribute to these impairments. Similarly, correlations between vascular asymmetries and tissue composition measures ranged from weak to moderate indicating some linkage between blood flow alterations and structural limb changes. These findings collectively suggest that post-stroke vascular changes represent an important, but not exclusive, contributor to overall limb impairment, warranting consideration alongside other physiological and functional measures in clinical assessment and rehabilitation planning.
The regression analyses revealed key predictors of vascular asymmetry (%SSD) after controlling for demographic and clinical factors. Reduced paretic arm use (MAL- AOU) predicted blood flow asymmetry but became non-significant after accounting for limb dominance. Motor impairment (FMA) independently predicted arterial diameter asymmetry, explaining 8% of variance. For vascularity index, both motor impairment and sensory changes (pain pressure threshold) were significant predictors, together accounting for nearly 20% of variance. These relationships persisted even after adjusting for limb dominance, highlighting the combined impact of motor and sensory deficits on post-stroke vascular changes.
From: Miller et al., Physical Therapy (2025).From: Miller et al., Physical Therapy (2025).From: Miller et al., Physical Therapy (2025).From: Miller et al., Physical Therapy (2025).
Câu hỏi và suy nghĩ
This study identifies significant vascular changes post stroke and their association with motor impairment in chronic stroke, though the modest correlation strength (ρ=0.25–0.35) suggests vascular factors only partially explain functional deficits. A critical unresolved question emerges: Are these vascular changes post stroke primarily caused by induced structural damage, chronic limb disuse, or both mechanisms?
While prior research confirms stroke-related vascular dysfunction (e.g., reduced arterial elasticity [1]), this study’s observational design cannot distinguish between:
Structural mechanisms: Endothelial dysfunction or neurovascular remodeling post-stroke, versus
Disuse mechanisms: Flow-mediated vascular atrophy from reduced paretic limb activity.
Notably, baseline differences in cognition, comorbidities, and medication use between groups (Table 1) may confound these associations, limiting causal interpretations.
Future directions should employ interventional designs to establish causality. Constraint- induced movement trials with pre/post vascular assessments could clarify whether forced paretic limb use reverses perfusion deficits—supporting a disuse mechanism—or if impairments persist, implicating irreversible structural damage. Such studies would inform whether vascular-targeted therapies (e.g., blood flow augmentation) should complement traditional motor rehabilitation.
Nói chuyện với tôi một cách ngớ ngẩn
The researchers began by testing key statistical assumptions to guide their analytic choices. Using the Shapiro-Wilk test, they evaluated whether continuous variables followed a normal distribution, which determined whether parametric tests (assuming normality) or non-parametric alternatives would be appropriate. Simultaneously, Levene’s test assessed homogeneity of variance across groups, ensuring comparable variability between stroke patients and controls. These preliminary checks were critical for validating subsequent analyses.
When examining relationships between variables, the team distinguished between different types of associations. A monotonic relationship—a consistently increasing or decreasing trend between two variables that isn’t necessarily linear—was assessed using Spearman’s ρ. This became particularly important when data violated normality assumptions or when analyzing ordinal measures. For normally distributed data showing linear patterns, Pearson’s r quantified the strength and direction of straightforward linear relationships.
The core analysis employed mixed-design ANOVA to evaluate complex group differences. This approach simultaneously assessed within-subject effects (comparing paretic versus nonparetic limbs in stroke patients), between-group effects (stroke versus control participants), and interaction effects (whether limb differences varied by group status). The ANOVA was complemented by effect size calculations (η2) to quantify the magnitude of observed differences.
Significant findings were further investigated through post-hoc tests:
Paired t-tests identified specific within-group limb differences
Independent t-tests compared the degree of asymmetry (%SSD) between stroke and control groups
All post-hoc tests employed Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = 0.017) to limit the probability of false positives (family-wise error rate) to ≤0.05 across all comparisons.
Additional analyses included:
Hierarchical regression to identify predictors of vascular asymmetry while controlling for covariates
Subgroup analyses based on limb dominance
Reliability testing (ICC) evaluated the consistency of repeated ultrasound
measurements for vascular parameters (Vflow, AD, VI)
The comprehensive approach ensured robust examination of both the magnitude and clinical relevance of observed effects while maintaining appropriate control for Type I error inflation.
Những thông điệp mang về nhà
Chronic stroke survivors show measurable vascular changes post stroke (reduced blood flow, arterial diameter, and tissue perfusion) in paretic limbs, which correlate—albeit modestly—with motor function. While these changes likely contribute to disability, their exact cause (stroke-induced vascular damage vs. disuse atrophy) remains unclear. Clinically, this underscores:
The value of monitoring vascular health alongside motor recovery, and
The potential for combined rehabilitation approaches targeting both mobility and perfusion (e.g., activity-based therapies to combat disuse). Future research should clarify whether vascular interventions could augment functional gains.
Assessment:
Vascular screening (e.g., ultrasound) may help identify patients at risk for poor recovery due to perfusion deficits. A multidisciplinary approach (e.g., integrating vascular and motor assessments) could clarify relationships between vascular changes and functional impairment.
Rehab Implications:
Intensive limb use (e.g., Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy/CIMT) may counteract disuse-related vascular changes post-stroke. Virtual reality could serve as a valuable clinical tool to address these adaptations.
Combined interventions targeting both perfusion (e.g., aerobic exercise) and motor function could synergistically improve metabolic and muscular adaptations in the paretic limb.
Caution: The modest correlations suggest vascular factors are part of a multifactorial impairment puzzle.
THỬ THÁCH: LÀM BÀI KIỂM TRA RẰNG 75% CÁC NHÀ VẬT LÝ TRỊ LIỆU KHÔNG ĐẠT ĐƯỢC
Trả lời 10 câu hỏi ngắn về kiến thức thiết yếu mà mỗi nhà vật lý trị liệu cần biết và tìm hiểu xem bạn có đạt điểm cao hơn không
Félix Bouchet
Research Content Reviewer
My goal is to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice. Through knowledge translation, I aim to empower physiotherapists by sharing the latest scientific data, fostering critical analysis, and breaking down the methodological patterns of studies. By promoting a deeper understanding of research, I strive to improve the quality of care we provide and strengthen the legitimacy of our profession within the healthcare system.
Nội dung này dành cho thành viên
Tạo tài khoản miễn phí của bạn để có quyền truy cập vào nội dung độc quyền này và nhiều hơn nữa!
Để mang đến trải nghiệm tốt nhất, chúng tôi và các đối tác sử dụng các công nghệ như cookie để lưu trữ và/hoặc truy cập thông tin thiết bị. Việc đồng ý với các công nghệ này sẽ cho phép chúng tôi và các đối tác của chúng tôi xử lý dữ liệu cá nhân như hành vi duyệt web hoặc ID duy nhất trên trang web này và hiển thị quảng cáo (không) được cá nhân hóa. Việc không đồng ý hoặc rút lại sự đồng ý có thể ảnh hưởng xấu đến một số tính năng và chức năng nhất định.
Nhấp vào bên dưới để đồng ý với các điều khoản trên hoặc đưa ra lựa chọn chi tiết. Lựa chọn của bạn sẽ chỉ được áp dụng cho trang web này. Bạn có thể thay đổi cài đặt của mình bất kỳ lúc nào, bao gồm cả việc rút lại sự đồng ý bằng cách sử dụng nút chuyển đổi trên Chính sách Cookie hoặc bằng cách nhấp vào nút quản lý sự đồng ý ở cuối màn hình.
Chức năngLuôn luôn hoạt động
Việc lưu trữ hoặc truy cập kỹ thuật là hoàn toàn cần thiết cho mục đích hợp pháp là cho phép sử dụng một dịch vụ cụ thể do người đăng ký hoặc người dùng yêu cầu rõ ràng hoặc cho mục đích duy nhất là thực hiện truyền tải thông tin qua mạng truyền thông điện tử.
Sở thích
Việc lưu trữ hoặc truy cập kỹ thuật là cần thiết cho mục đích hợp pháp là lưu trữ các tùy chọn không được người đăng ký hoặc người dùng yêu cầu.
Thống kê
Lưu trữ hoặc truy cập kỹ thuật được sử dụng riêng cho mục đích thống kê.Lưu trữ hoặc truy cập kỹ thuật được sử dụng riêng cho mục đích thống kê ẩn danh. Nếu không có lệnh triệu tập, sự tuân thủ tự nguyện từ phía Nhà cung cấp dịch vụ Internet của bạn hoặc hồ sơ bổ sung từ bên thứ ba, thông tin được lưu trữ hoặc truy xuất chỉ vì mục đích này thường không thể được sử dụng để nhận dạng bạn.
Tiếp thị
Cần phải lưu trữ hoặc truy cập kỹ thuật để tạo hồ sơ người dùng nhằm gửi quảng cáo hoặc theo dõi người dùng trên một trang web hoặc trên nhiều trang web cho mục đích tiếp thị tương tự.