Manual Therapy and Exercise on Brain Adaptations in Neck Pain
Giới thiệu
Chronic nonspecific neck pain is a prevalent condition that leads to significant disability and increased healthcare costs. While traditional physical therapy approaches, such as range of motion exercises and passive modalities, are commonly used, emerging evidence suggests that manual therapy combined with therapeutic exercise may offer superior outcomes. However, the underlying brain adaptations in neck pain associated with these interventions remain underexplored.
Chronic pain is widely recognized as being linked to maladaptations in the central nervous system (CNS), contributing to persistent pain and dysfunction. Manual therapy has been shown to modulate pain through neurophysiological effects, while therapeutic exercise may help desensitize the CNS. Understanding how these treatments influence brain adaptations in neck pain and pain processing, is essential for optimizing rehabilitation strategies and improving patient outcomes.
Study Objectives
This randomized controlled trial aimed to:
Investigate how manual therapy combined with exercise influences brain adaptations in neck pain patients (e.g. cortical thickness and volume) compared to routine physical therapy.
Assess clinical improvements in pain, disability, psychological symptoms, cervical mobility, and muscle strength.
Explore brain structure differences between patients with significant pain relief (≥50% reduction) and those with minimal improvement.
Examine potential correlations between brain changes and clinical outcomes.
It was hypothesized that manual therapy combined with exercise would more effectively alter pain-related brain regions than routine physical therapy, leading to greater clinical improvements.
Phương pháp
This study used a parallel single-blinded randomized controlled trial design.
Participants
Adults (18–59 years) with chronic nonspecific neck pain (≥ 3 months, VAS ≥ 35 mm on a 100 mm VAS) were recruited via hospitals, clinics, and social media. Exclusion criteria included prior neck injury/surgery, neurological or musculoskeletal disorders, metabolic conditions, psychiatric disorders, BMI ≥ 25, MRI contraindications, or physiotherapy in the past year.
Randomization & Blinding
Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either an intervention or control group using computer-generated sequences, stratified by age and gender. Independent assessors and MRI analysts were blinded to group allocation.
From : Chaikla, R. et al.,d The Journal of Pain (2025).From : Chaikla, R. et al.,The Journal of Pain (2025).
Can thiệp
Intervention group: Participants received cervical mobilization and a progressive exercise program targeting neck, shoulder muscles, posture, and function. Manual therapy focused on the most symptomatic cervical segment, determined by the physiotherapist’s assessment. Exercises included cervical flexor/extensor training, axioscapular strengthening, and postural corrections, with progression in repetitions, direction, and load. Sessions occurred twice weekly (30–40 minutes) for 10 weeks, with daily home exercises recorded in a diary. To ensure consistency, physiotherapists underwent a three-day training.
Control group: Received routine physical therapy (modalities, cervical ROM exercises, stretching) twice weekly for 10 weeks.
Biện pháp kết quả
Primary Outcome: Brain structure changes (cortical thickness & volume) assessed via MRI (FreeSurfer analysis). This method automatically identified and mapped different brain structures using two well-established brain atlases (Desikan-Killiany and Destrieux).
Based on previous research, they focused on specific brain regions, including bilaterally:
Primary motor cortex (M1) – involved in movement control
Insula – linked to pain perception and emotional processing
Prefrontal cortex (PFC) – plays a role in decision-making and pain regulation
Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) – involved in pain processing and emotional responses
Precuneus – associated with self-awareness and cognitive functions
Primary somatosensory cortex (S1) – processes sensory information like touch and pain
Thalamus – a key relay center for sensory and pain signals
Secondary Outcomes: The study measured different aspects of neck pain and function using the following methods:
Neck Pain Intensity: Measured with a 0–100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable.
Neck Disability: Assessed using the Thai version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI), with higher scores indicating more disability.
Anxiety & Depression: Evaluated with the Thai version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), where higher scores mean worse symptoms.
Cervical Range of Motion (ROM): Measured in all directions (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation) using a CROM goniometer. Each movement was recorded three times, and the average was used.
Cervical Muscle Strength: Tested with a handheld dynamometer, measuring cranio-cervical muscle strength three times, with the highest value recorded.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant demographics and baseline/post-treatment data.
Brain structure analysis: Differences in cortical volume and thickness were assessed with FreeSurfer software, using corrections for multiple comparisons (FDR and TFCE methods), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Group comparisons:
ANCOVA (adjusted for baseline values) tested differences between groups in brain regions of interest (ROIs) and other outcomes.
General linear mixed model analyzed changes within each group.
Effect sizes were reported using partial eta squared (η²p), with thresholds of 0.01 (small), 0.06 (moderate), and 0.14 (large).
Responder analysis: Participants with ≥ 50% pain reduction were classified as responders, and those with < 50% reduction as non-responders. Brain changes were compared between these groups using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Correlations: Relationships between brain changes and clinical characteristics (pain, disability, psychological symptoms) were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation.
Further details on the statistical methods used in this study can be found in the “Talk nerdy to me” section.
Kết quả
Participants and Interventions
The study ran from November 2022 to February 2024, enrolling 52 participants from 367 volunteers, with no loss to follow-up.
Intervention group: Completed 20 sessions over 10 weeks (one participant completed 19 sessions). Over 80% adherence to home exercises, and no additional treatments reported.
Control group: Received routine physical therapy. Three participants (11.54%) used NSAIDs, and two (7.69%) received massages. No significant adverse events occurred.
Primary Outcomes
Brain structure changes :
Intervention group: Increased cortical thickness and volume in some brain areas compared to controls (except for specific regions with decreases).
Regions of Interest (ROIs) Analysis:
Increased thickness in both ACC hemispheres.
Decreased thickness in left PFC, left/right S1, and left/right precuneus.
Control group showed cortical thinning in left S1, left M1, and right precuneus.
No significant changes in cortical volume in either group.
ANCOVA analysis: Intervention group showed greater cortical thickening in left/right ACC and left M1 compared to controls.
From : Chaikla, R. et al.,The Journal of Pain (2025).
From : Chaikla, R. et al.,The Journal of Pain (2025).
From : Chaikla, R. et al.,The Journal of Pain (2025).
Secondary Outcomes
Both groups showed improvements in neck pain intensity, neck disability, psychological symptoms, cervical ROM, and muscle strength. (p < 0.05, η2p = 0.10 – 0.84).
The ANCOVA analysis showed that the intervention group had significantly greater improvements in neck pain intensity, disability, and cervical range of motion (all directions) compared to the control group (p < 0.05), with effect sizes (η2p) ranging from moderate to large (0.09 to 0.33).
No significant differences between groups in psychological symptoms (anxiety/depression) or cervical muscle strength. (p > 0.05).
From : Chaikla, R. et al.,d The Journal of Pain (2025).
Brain Changes and clinical improvement in neck pain intensity
80.77% (42 participants) had ≥50% improvement in pain intensity (25 intervention vs. 17 control). More responders in the intervention group (p = 0.01).
Responders ( ≥50% improvement in pain intensity) showed:
Decreased left S1 thickness & right PFC volume.Increased right insular volume.Non-responders (<50% improvement in pain intensity) showed:
Increased left S1 thickness & right PFC volume.Decreased right insular volume.Pain intensity reduction was negatively correlated with cortical thickness in left ACC, PFC, M1 and volume in left S1, left M1, right insular.
Disability reduction correlated with right thalamus volume changes.
No correlation between psychological changes and brain structure changes.
From : Chaikla, R. et al., The Journal of Pain (2025).
Key findings
The intervention led to significant brain structure changes and better clinical outcomes (pain reduction, function improvement).
Greater cortical thickening in key regions correlated with pain processing.
Responders had distinct brain structure changes compared to non-responders.
Neck pain and disability improvements were linked to specific brain changes, but psychological improvements were not.
Câu hỏi và suy nghĩ
Pain assessment is inherently complex due to its subjective nature. According to the Toussignant-Laflamme pain model, pain is multifactorial, influenced by a combination of biological, psychological, social, and environmental factors. However, the study relies heavily on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain measurement, which is highly subjective and may not fully capture the complexity of pain. The proposed classification of patients into those with <50% or >50% pain reduction oversimplifies the pain experience and may not adequately reflect the diverse drivers of pain.
The Toussignant-Laflamme model emphasizes that environmental, contextual, and cognitive factors play significant roles in pain perception, yet these factors were poorly assessed in this study. For example, factors such as patient beliefs, social context, and environmental stressors could have influenced outcomes but were not systematically evaluated. Psychological or psychosocial factors, often referred to as “yellow flags” (e.g., fear of movement, anxiety, or depression), are known to influence pain perception and recovery but were not adequately explored. This lack of consideration for confounding variables limits the study’s ability to fully explain the mechanisms behind pain relief or treatment responsiveness.
Additionally, for patients suffering from chronic pain, central sensitization is a well-known mechanism that perpetuates pain. Central sensitization involves heightened sensitivity of the central nervous system to pain signals, often leading to amplified pain responses. Including an assessment of central sensitization, such as the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), would have provided valuable clinical insights into its potential correlation with structural brain changes.
Nói chuyện với tôi một cách ngớ ngẩn
The study employed a robust statistical framework to analyze structural brain changes and their relationship with clinical symptoms. Researchers measured cortical thickness and brain volume across thousands of voxels (small 3D units used in brain imagery), applying False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction to control the proportion of false positives. FDR ranks p-values and adjusts the significance threshold, ensuring a low rate of false positives while maintaining sensitivity. To enhance detection of spatially extended effects, Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement (TFCE) was used, which identifies clusters of voxels without requiring arbitrary thresholds, refining the results by focusing on meaningful patterns in the data. For additional rigor, Family-Wise Error (FWE) correction was applied, ensuring a very low probability of any false positives across the entire dataset. This combination of methods (FDR, TFCE, and FWE) provided high confidence in the findings.
Between-group differences in brain structure and secondary outcomes (e.g., pain intensity, range of motion) were analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA), with baseline values as covariates. Changes within groups over time were assessed using a General Linear Mixed Model (GLMM), which accounted for repeated measurements. The magnitude of intervention effects was quantified using Partial Eta Squared (η2ₚ), with thresholds for small (0.01), moderate (0.06), and large effects (0.14+). Participants were classified as responders (≥50% pain reduction) or non-responders, and Mann-Whitney U tests compared brain structure changes between these groups. Finally, Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to examine associations between structural brain changes and clinical outcomes (e.g., pain intensity, disability, psychological symptoms).
While the statistical methods were rigorous, it’s important to note that the study only explored correlations, not causation. Further research is needed to investigate the mechanisms underlying central nervous system (CNS) adaptations resulting from manual therapy and specific exercise interventions.
Những thông điệp mang về nhà
Brain Structure and Pain – Alterations in cortical thickness and volume were linked to changes in pain intensity and disability, suggesting that central mechanisms contribute to musculoskeletal pain.
Responder vs. Non-Responder Differences – Patients who achieved significant pain reduction (≥50%) also displayed distinct brain structure changes, reinforcing the idea that effective rehabilitation extends beyond physical improvements.
Optimizing Treatment Approach – The study suggests that combining manual therapy and exercise is more effective for nonspecific chronic neck pain than conventional physiotherapy. The Maitland manual therapy framework provides a solid starting point, while exercise prescription should be individualized based on a thorough patient evaluation.
Comprehensive Patient Assessment – Therapists should assess psychosocial contributors to pain (yellow flags) using tools such as the StarT Back Questionnaire, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, or the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Additionally, considering environmental factors during the subjective evaluation may help refine treatment strategies.
5 KỸ THUẬT ĐIỀU KHIỂN / ĐIỀU KHIỂN CẦN THIẾT MÀ MỌI NHÀ VẬT LÝ HỌC NÊN THÀNH THẠO
Học 5 kỹ thuật điều khiển/vận động cơ bản trong 5 ngày giúp nâng cao kỹ năng trị liệu bằng tay của bạn ngay lập tức – Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Félix Bouchet
Research Content Reviewer.
My goal is to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice. Through knowledge translation, I aim to empower physiotherapists by sharing the latest scientific data, fostering critical analysis, and breaking down the methodological patterns of studies. By promoting a deeper understanding of research, I strive to improve the quality of care we provide and strengthen the legitimacy of our profession within the healthcare system.
Nội dung này dành cho thành viên
Tạo tài khoản miễn phí của bạn để có quyền truy cập vào nội dung độc quyền này và nhiều hơn nữa!
Để mang đến trải nghiệm tốt nhất, chúng tôi và các đối tác sử dụng các công nghệ như cookie để lưu trữ và/hoặc truy cập thông tin thiết bị. Việc đồng ý với các công nghệ này sẽ cho phép chúng tôi và các đối tác của chúng tôi xử lý dữ liệu cá nhân như hành vi duyệt web hoặc ID duy nhất trên trang web này và hiển thị quảng cáo (không) được cá nhân hóa. Việc không đồng ý hoặc rút lại sự đồng ý có thể ảnh hưởng xấu đến một số tính năng và chức năng nhất định.
Nhấp vào bên dưới để đồng ý với các điều khoản trên hoặc đưa ra lựa chọn chi tiết. Lựa chọn của bạn sẽ chỉ được áp dụng cho trang web này. Bạn có thể thay đổi cài đặt của mình bất kỳ lúc nào, bao gồm cả việc rút lại sự đồng ý bằng cách sử dụng nút chuyển đổi trên Chính sách Cookie hoặc bằng cách nhấp vào nút quản lý sự đồng ý ở cuối màn hình.
Chức năngLuôn luôn hoạt động
Việc lưu trữ hoặc truy cập kỹ thuật là hoàn toàn cần thiết cho mục đích hợp pháp là cho phép sử dụng một dịch vụ cụ thể do người đăng ký hoặc người dùng yêu cầu rõ ràng hoặc cho mục đích duy nhất là thực hiện truyền tải thông tin qua mạng truyền thông điện tử.
Sở thích
Việc lưu trữ hoặc truy cập kỹ thuật là cần thiết cho mục đích hợp pháp là lưu trữ các tùy chọn không được người đăng ký hoặc người dùng yêu cầu.
Thống kê
Lưu trữ hoặc truy cập kỹ thuật được sử dụng riêng cho mục đích thống kê.Lưu trữ hoặc truy cập kỹ thuật được sử dụng riêng cho mục đích thống kê ẩn danh. Nếu không có lệnh triệu tập, sự tuân thủ tự nguyện từ phía Nhà cung cấp dịch vụ Internet của bạn hoặc hồ sơ bổ sung từ bên thứ ba, thông tin được lưu trữ hoặc truy xuất chỉ vì mục đích này thường không thể được sử dụng để nhận dạng bạn.
Tiếp thị
Cần phải lưu trữ hoặc truy cập kỹ thuật để tạo hồ sơ người dùng nhằm gửi quảng cáo hoặc theo dõi người dùng trên một trang web hoặc trên nhiều trang web cho mục đích tiếp thị tương tự.